Difference between revisions of "Interpersonal relationship"

From Psychotherapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Interpersonal relationship" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
n '''interpersonal relationship''' is an association between two or more people that may range from fleeting to enduring. This association may be based on [[limerence]], [[love]], [[solidarity]], regular business interactions, or some other type of social commitment. Interpersonal relationships are formed in the context of social, cultural and other influences. The context can vary from [[family]] or [[kinship]] relations, [[friendship]], [[marriage]], relations with associates, [[employment|work]], [[club]]s, [[neighborhood]]s, and [[places of worship]]. They may be regulated by [[law]], [[norm (sociology)|custom]], or mutual agreement, and are the basis of [[social group]]s and [[society]] as a whole.
  
 +
A relationship is normally viewed as a connection between two individuals, such as a romantic or [[intimate relationship]], or a [[attachment theory|parent–child relationship]]. Individuals can also have relationships with groups of people, such as the relation between a pastor and his congregation, an uncle and a family, or a mayor and a town. Finally, groups or even nations may have relations with each other, though this is a much broader domain than that covered under the topic of interpersonal relationships. See such articles as [[international relations]] for more information on associations between groups. Most scholarly work on relationships focuses on [[romance (love)|romantic]] partners in pairs or [[Dyad (sociology)|dyads]]. These intimate relationships are, however, only a small subset of interpersonal relationships. Interpersonal relationships can also include friendships, such as relationships involving individuals providing [[relational care]] to marginalized persons.
 +
 +
These relationships usually involve some level of interdependence. People in a relationship tend to influence each other, share their thoughts and feelings, and engage in activities together. Because of this interdependence, most things that change or impact one member of the relationship will have some level of impact on the other member.<ref>[[Ellen S Berscheid|Berscheid, E.]], & Peplau, L.A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In H.H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), ''Close relationships''. (pp. 1–19). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.</ref> The study of interpersonal relationships involves several branches of  the [[social sciences]], including such disciplines as [[sociology]], [[psychology]], [[anthropology]], and [[social work]].
 +
{{TOC limit|3}}
 +
 +
==Development==
 +
Interpersonal relationships are [[relational dialectics|dynamic systems]] that change continuously during their existence. Like living organisms, relationships have a beginning, a lifespan, and an end. They tend to grow and improve gradually, as people get to know each other and become closer emotionally, or they gradually deteriorate as people drift apart, move on with their lives and form new relationships with others. One of the most influential models of relationship development was proposed by psychologist George Levinger.<ref>Levinger, G. (1983). Development and change. In H.H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), ''Close relationships''. (pp. 315–359). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.</ref> This model was formulated to describe heterosexual, adult romantic relationships, but it has been applied to other kinds of interpersonal relations as well. According to the model, the natural development of a relationship follows five stages:
 +
# ''Acquaintance'' – Becoming acquainted depends on previous relationships, physical [[Propinquity|proximity]], first impressions, and a variety of other factors. If two people begin to like each other, continued interactions may lead to the next stage, but acquaintance can continue indefinitely.
 +
# ''Buildup'' – During this stage, people begin to [[trust (social sciences)|trust]] and care about each other. The need for intimacy, compatibility and such filtering agents as common background and goals will influence whether or not interaction continues.
 +
# ''Continuation'' – This stage follows a mutual [[personal commitment|commitment]] to a long-term friendship, romantic relationship, or marriage. It is generally a long, relative stable period. Nevertheless, continued growth and development will occur during this time. Mutual trust is important for sustaining the relationship.
 +
# ''Deterioration'' – Not all relationships deteriorate, but those that do tend to show signs of trouble. Boredom, resentment, and dissatisfaction may occur, and individuals may communicate less and avoid [[self-disclosure]]. Loss of trust and betrayals may take place as the downward spiral continues, eventually ending the relationship. (Alternately, the participants may find some way to resolve the problems and reestablish trust.)
 +
# ''Termination'' – The final stage marks the end of the relationship, either by death in the case of a healthy relationship, or by separation.
 +
 +
[[Friendship]]s may involve some degree of [[transitive relation|transitivity]]. In other words, a person may become a friend of an existing friend's friend. However, if two people have a sexual relationship with the same person, they may become [[competitor]]s rather than friends. Accordingly, sexual behavior with the sexual partner of a friend may damage the friendship (see [[love triangle]]). [[Sexual activities]] between two friends tend to alter that relationship, either by "taking it to the next level" or by severing it. [[Sexual partner]]s may also be classified as [[friend]]s and the sexual relationship may either enhance or depreciate the friendship.
 +
 +
Legal sanction reinforces and regularizes [[marriage]]s and [[civil union]]s as perceived "[[respectability|respectable]]" building-blocks of [[society]]. In the [[United States of America]], for example, the de-criminalization of [[homosexual]] sexual relations in the Supreme Court decision, [[Lawrence v. Texas]] (2003) facilitated the mainstreaming of gay long-term relationships, and broached the possibility of the legalization of [[same-sex marriage]]s in that country.
 +
 +
==Flourishing relationships==
 +
Positive psychologists use the term "flourishing relationships" to describe interpersonal relationships that are not merely happy, but instead characterized by [[intimacy]], growth, and resilience.<ref>Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Toward a positive relationship science. ''Journal of Family Theory & Review'', 2, 4–24.</ref> Flourishing relationships also allow a dynamic balance between focus on the intimate relationships and focus on other social relationships.
 +
 +
===Background===
 +
While traditional psychologists specializing in close relationships have focused on relationship dysfunction, [[positive psychology]] argues that relationship health is not merely the absence of relationship dysfunction.<ref name=snyder>Snyder, C.R., & Lopez, Shane, J. (2007). "Positive psychology: the scientific and practical explorations of human strengths.", Thousand Oaks, California: [[Sage Publications]], 297–321.</ref> Healthy relationships are built on a foundation of [[secure attachment]] and are maintained with love and purposeful positive relationship behaviors. Additionally, healthy relationships can be made to "flourish." Positive psychologists are exploring what makes existing relationships flourish and what skills can be taught to partners to enhance their existing and future personal relationships.
 +
 +
====Adult attachment====
 +
Healthy relationships are built on a foundation of secure attachments. [[Adult attachment]] models represent an internal set of expectations and preferences regarding [[Intimate relationships|relationship intimacy]] that guide behavior.<ref name=snyder/> Secure adult attachment, characterized by low attachment-related avoidance and anxiety, has numerous benefits. Within the context of safe, secure attachments, people can pursue optimal human functioning and flourishing.<ref name=snyder/>
 +
 +
====Love====
 +
The capacity for [[love]] gives depth to human relationships, brings people closer to each other physically and emotionally, and makes people think expansively about themselves and the world.<ref name=snyder/> In his [[triangular theory of love]], psychologist [[Robert Sternberg]] theorizes that love is a mix of three components: (1) passion, or physical attraction; (2) [[intimacy]], or feelings of closeness; and (3) commitment, involving the decision to initiate and sustain a relationship. The presence of all three components characterizes [[consummate love]], the most durable type of love. In addition, the presence of intimacy and passion in marital relationships predicts marital satisfaction. Also, commitment is the best predictor of relationship satisfaction, especially in long-term relationships. Positive consequences of being in love include increased self-esteem and [[self-efficacy]].<ref name=snyder/>
 +
 +
===Theories and empirical research===
 +
====Minding relationships====
 +
The mindfulness theory of relationships shows how closeness in relationships may be enhanced. Minding is the "reciprocal knowing process involving the nonstop, interrelated thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of persons in a relationship."<ref>John H. Harvey, J.H., & Pauwels, B.G. (2009). Relationship Connection: A Redux on the Role of Minding and the Quality of Feeling Special in the Enhancement of Closeness. [Eds.] Snyder, C.D., & Lopez, S.J. ''Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology: Second Edition''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 385–392.</ref> Five components of "minding" include:<ref name=snyder/>
 +
# Knowing and being known: seeking to understand the partner
 +
# Making relationship-enhancing attributions for behaviors: giving the benefit of the doubt
 +
# Accepting and respecting: empathy and social skills
 +
# Maintaining reciprocity: active participation in relationship enhancement
 +
# Continuity in minding: persisting in mindfulness
 +
 +
====Culture of appreciation====
 +
After studying married couples for many years, psychologist [[John Gottman]] has proposed the theory of the "magic ratio" for successful marriages. The theory says that for a marriage to be successful, couples must average a ratio of five positive interactions to one negative interaction. As the ratio moves to 1:1, divorce becomes more likely.<ref name=snyder/> Interpersonal interactions associated with negative relationships include criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling. Over time, therapy aims to turn these interpersonal strategies into more positive ones, which include complaint, appreciation, acceptance of responsibility, and self-soothing. Similarly, partners in interpersonal relationships can incorporate positive components into difficult subjects in order to avoid emotional disconnection.
 +
 +
====Capitalizing on positive events====
 +
People can capitalize on positive events in an interpersonal context to work toward flourishing relationships. People often turn to others to share their good news (termed "capitalization"). Studies show that both the act of telling others about good events and the response of the person with whom the event was shared have personal and interpersonal consequences, including increased positive emotions, subjective well-being, and self-esteem, and relationship benefits including intimacy, commitment, trust, liking, closeness, and stability.<ref>Gable, S.L., & Reis, H.T. (2010). Good News! Capitalizing on Positive Events in an Interpersonal Context. ''Advances in Experimental Social Psychology'', 42, 195–257.</ref> Studies show that the act of communicating positive events was associated with increased positive affect and well-being (beyond the impact of the positive event itself). Other studies have found that relationships in which partners responded to "good news" communication enthusiastically were associated with higher relationship well-being.<ref>Gable, S.L., Reis, H.T., Impett, E.A., Asher, E.R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. ''Journal of Personality and Social Psychology'', 87, 228–245.</ref>
 +
 +
===Other perspectives===
 +
====Neurobiology of interpersonal connections====
 +
There is an emerging body of research across multiple disciplines investigating the neurological basis of attachment and the prosocial emotions and behaviors that are the prerequisites for healthy adult relationships.<ref name=snyder/> The social environment, mediated by attachment, influences the maturation of structures in a child's brain. This might explain how infant attachment affects adult emotional health. Researchers are currently investigating the link between positive caregiver–child relationships and the development of hormone systems, such as the HPA axis.
 +
 +
===Applications===
 +
Researchers are developing an approach to couples therapy that moves partners from patterns of repeated conflict to patterns of more positive, comfortable exchanges. Goals of therapy include development of social and interpersonal skills. Expressing gratitude and sharing appreciation for a partner is the primary means for creating a positive relationship. Positive marital counseling also emphasizes mindfulness. The further study of "flourishing relationships could shape the future of premarital and marital counseling as well."<ref name=snyder/>
 +
 +
===Controversies===
 +
Some researchers criticize positive psychology for studying positive processes in isolation from negative processes. On the contrary, some argue that positive and negative processes in relationships may be better understood as functionally independent, not as opposites of each other.<ref>Maniaci, M.R., & Reis, H.T. (2010). The Marriage of Positive Psychology and Relationship Science: A Reply to Fincham and Beach. ''Journal of Family Theory & Review'', 2, 47–53.</ref>
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
{{wikiquote}}
 +
{{wikiversity|interpersonal relationships}}
 +
{{main|Outline of relationships}}
 +
{{refbegin|2}}
 +
* [[Affection]]
 +
* [[Attachment theory]]
 +
* [[Courtship]]
 +
* [[Empathy]]
 +
* [[Empowerment]]
 +
* [[Friendship]]
 +
* [[Human bonding]]
 +
* [[Interpersonal attraction]]
 +
* [[Interpersonal communication]]
 +
* [[Interpersonal compatibility]]
 +
* [[Intimate relationship]]
 +
* [[Jointness (psychodynamics)]]
 +
* [[Love]]
 +
* [[People skills]]
 +
* [[Social interaction]]
 +
* [[Social rejection]]
 +
* [[Sympathy]]
 +
* [[Theology of relational care]]
 +
{{refend}}
 +
 +
==References==
 +
===Notes===
 +
{{reflist|2}}
 +
 +
===General references===
 +
* Reynolds, Karen. "What is the Transmission Model of Interpersonal Communication and What is Wrong with it?", http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/kjr9601.html, April 1997
 +
* Chandler, Daniel. "The Transmission Model of Communication", http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/trans.html, September 4, 2009
 +
 +
==External links==
 +
{{Wiktionary|interpersonal}}
 +
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1396917,00.html "What are friends for?"], ''[[The Guardian]]''
 +
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Interpersonal Relationship}}
 +
[[Category:Interpersonal relationships| ]]
 +
[[Category:Marriage]]

Revision as of 15:49, 19 February 2011

n interpersonal relationship is an association between two or more people that may range from fleeting to enduring. This association may be based on limerence, love, solidarity, regular business interactions, or some other type of social commitment. Interpersonal relationships are formed in the context of social, cultural and other influences. The context can vary from family or kinship relations, friendship, marriage, relations with associates, work, clubs, neighborhoods, and places of worship. They may be regulated by law, custom, or mutual agreement, and are the basis of social groups and society as a whole.

A relationship is normally viewed as a connection between two individuals, such as a romantic or intimate relationship, or a parent–child relationship. Individuals can also have relationships with groups of people, such as the relation between a pastor and his congregation, an uncle and a family, or a mayor and a town. Finally, groups or even nations may have relations with each other, though this is a much broader domain than that covered under the topic of interpersonal relationships. See such articles as international relations for more information on associations between groups. Most scholarly work on relationships focuses on romantic partners in pairs or dyads. These intimate relationships are, however, only a small subset of interpersonal relationships. Interpersonal relationships can also include friendships, such as relationships involving individuals providing relational care to marginalized persons.

These relationships usually involve some level of interdependence. People in a relationship tend to influence each other, share their thoughts and feelings, and engage in activities together. Because of this interdependence, most things that change or impact one member of the relationship will have some level of impact on the other member.[1] The study of interpersonal relationships involves several branches of the social sciences, including such disciplines as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and social work.

Development

Interpersonal relationships are dynamic systems that change continuously during their existence. Like living organisms, relationships have a beginning, a lifespan, and an end. They tend to grow and improve gradually, as people get to know each other and become closer emotionally, or they gradually deteriorate as people drift apart, move on with their lives and form new relationships with others. One of the most influential models of relationship development was proposed by psychologist George Levinger.[2] This model was formulated to describe heterosexual, adult romantic relationships, but it has been applied to other kinds of interpersonal relations as well. According to the model, the natural development of a relationship follows five stages:

  1. Acquaintance – Becoming acquainted depends on previous relationships, physical proximity, first impressions, and a variety of other factors. If two people begin to like each other, continued interactions may lead to the next stage, but acquaintance can continue indefinitely.
  2. Buildup – During this stage, people begin to trust and care about each other. The need for intimacy, compatibility and such filtering agents as common background and goals will influence whether or not interaction continues.
  3. Continuation – This stage follows a mutual commitment to a long-term friendship, romantic relationship, or marriage. It is generally a long, relative stable period. Nevertheless, continued growth and development will occur during this time. Mutual trust is important for sustaining the relationship.
  4. Deterioration – Not all relationships deteriorate, but those that do tend to show signs of trouble. Boredom, resentment, and dissatisfaction may occur, and individuals may communicate less and avoid self-disclosure. Loss of trust and betrayals may take place as the downward spiral continues, eventually ending the relationship. (Alternately, the participants may find some way to resolve the problems and reestablish trust.)
  5. Termination – The final stage marks the end of the relationship, either by death in the case of a healthy relationship, or by separation.

Friendships may involve some degree of transitivity. In other words, a person may become a friend of an existing friend's friend. However, if two people have a sexual relationship with the same person, they may become competitors rather than friends. Accordingly, sexual behavior with the sexual partner of a friend may damage the friendship (see love triangle). Sexual activities between two friends tend to alter that relationship, either by "taking it to the next level" or by severing it. Sexual partners may also be classified as friends and the sexual relationship may either enhance or depreciate the friendship.

Legal sanction reinforces and regularizes marriages and civil unions as perceived "respectable" building-blocks of society. In the United States of America, for example, the de-criminalization of homosexual sexual relations in the Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. Texas (2003) facilitated the mainstreaming of gay long-term relationships, and broached the possibility of the legalization of same-sex marriages in that country.

Flourishing relationships

Positive psychologists use the term "flourishing relationships" to describe interpersonal relationships that are not merely happy, but instead characterized by intimacy, growth, and resilience.[3] Flourishing relationships also allow a dynamic balance between focus on the intimate relationships and focus on other social relationships.

Background

While traditional psychologists specializing in close relationships have focused on relationship dysfunction, positive psychology argues that relationship health is not merely the absence of relationship dysfunction.[4] Healthy relationships are built on a foundation of secure attachment and are maintained with love and purposeful positive relationship behaviors. Additionally, healthy relationships can be made to "flourish." Positive psychologists are exploring what makes existing relationships flourish and what skills can be taught to partners to enhance their existing and future personal relationships.

Adult attachment

Healthy relationships are built on a foundation of secure attachments. Adult attachment models represent an internal set of expectations and preferences regarding relationship intimacy that guide behavior.[4] Secure adult attachment, characterized by low attachment-related avoidance and anxiety, has numerous benefits. Within the context of safe, secure attachments, people can pursue optimal human functioning and flourishing.[4]

Love

The capacity for love gives depth to human relationships, brings people closer to each other physically and emotionally, and makes people think expansively about themselves and the world.[4] In his triangular theory of love, psychologist Robert Sternberg theorizes that love is a mix of three components: (1) passion, or physical attraction; (2) intimacy, or feelings of closeness; and (3) commitment, involving the decision to initiate and sustain a relationship. The presence of all three components characterizes consummate love, the most durable type of love. In addition, the presence of intimacy and passion in marital relationships predicts marital satisfaction. Also, commitment is the best predictor of relationship satisfaction, especially in long-term relationships. Positive consequences of being in love include increased self-esteem and self-efficacy.[4]

Theories and empirical research

Minding relationships

The mindfulness theory of relationships shows how closeness in relationships may be enhanced. Minding is the "reciprocal knowing process involving the nonstop, interrelated thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of persons in a relationship."[5] Five components of "minding" include:[4]

  1. Knowing and being known: seeking to understand the partner
  2. Making relationship-enhancing attributions for behaviors: giving the benefit of the doubt
  3. Accepting and respecting: empathy and social skills
  4. Maintaining reciprocity: active participation in relationship enhancement
  5. Continuity in minding: persisting in mindfulness

Culture of appreciation

After studying married couples for many years, psychologist John Gottman has proposed the theory of the "magic ratio" for successful marriages. The theory says that for a marriage to be successful, couples must average a ratio of five positive interactions to one negative interaction. As the ratio moves to 1:1, divorce becomes more likely.[4] Interpersonal interactions associated with negative relationships include criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling. Over time, therapy aims to turn these interpersonal strategies into more positive ones, which include complaint, appreciation, acceptance of responsibility, and self-soothing. Similarly, partners in interpersonal relationships can incorporate positive components into difficult subjects in order to avoid emotional disconnection.

Capitalizing on positive events

People can capitalize on positive events in an interpersonal context to work toward flourishing relationships. People often turn to others to share their good news (termed "capitalization"). Studies show that both the act of telling others about good events and the response of the person with whom the event was shared have personal and interpersonal consequences, including increased positive emotions, subjective well-being, and self-esteem, and relationship benefits including intimacy, commitment, trust, liking, closeness, and stability.[6] Studies show that the act of communicating positive events was associated with increased positive affect and well-being (beyond the impact of the positive event itself). Other studies have found that relationships in which partners responded to "good news" communication enthusiastically were associated with higher relationship well-being.[7]

Other perspectives

Neurobiology of interpersonal connections

There is an emerging body of research across multiple disciplines investigating the neurological basis of attachment and the prosocial emotions and behaviors that are the prerequisites for healthy adult relationships.[4] The social environment, mediated by attachment, influences the maturation of structures in a child's brain. This might explain how infant attachment affects adult emotional health. Researchers are currently investigating the link between positive caregiver–child relationships and the development of hormone systems, such as the HPA axis.

Applications

Researchers are developing an approach to couples therapy that moves partners from patterns of repeated conflict to patterns of more positive, comfortable exchanges. Goals of therapy include development of social and interpersonal skills. Expressing gratitude and sharing appreciation for a partner is the primary means for creating a positive relationship. Positive marital counseling also emphasizes mindfulness. The further study of "flourishing relationships could shape the future of premarital and marital counseling as well."[4]

Controversies

Some researchers criticize positive psychology for studying positive processes in isolation from negative processes. On the contrary, some argue that positive and negative processes in relationships may be better understood as functionally independent, not as opposites of each other.[8]

See also

Template:Wikiquote Template:Wikiversity

</dl>

References

Notes

  1. ↑ Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L.A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In H.H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships. (pp. 1–19). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  2. ↑ Levinger, G. (1983). Development and change. In H.H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships. (pp. 315–359). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  3. ↑ Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Toward a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 4–24.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Snyder, C.R., & Lopez, Shane, J. (2007). "Positive psychology: the scientific and practical explorations of human strengths.", Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 297–321.
  5. ↑ John H. Harvey, J.H., & Pauwels, B.G. (2009). Relationship Connection: A Redux on the Role of Minding and the Quality of Feeling Special in the Enhancement of Closeness. [Eds.] Snyder, C.D., & Lopez, S.J. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology: Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 385–392.
  6. ↑ Gable, S.L., & Reis, H.T. (2010). Good News! Capitalizing on Positive Events in an Interpersonal Context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 195–257.
  7. ↑ Gable, S.L., Reis, H.T., Impett, E.A., Asher, E.R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245.
  8. ↑ Maniaci, M.R., & Reis, H.T. (2010). The Marriage of Positive Psychology and Relationship Science: A Reply to Fincham and Beach. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 47–53.

General references

External links

{{#invoke:Side box|main}}

Retrieved from "http://www.unifiedpsychotherapyproject.org/psychotherapedia/index.php?title=Interpersonal_relationship&oldid=53399"